SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2084

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL

ON THE 29th OF SEPTEMBER, 2022

MISC. PETITION No. 3031 of 2022

BETWEEN:-

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY

LIMITED

DIVISIONAL OFFICER THROUGH ITS T P HUB

INCHARGE HOTEL AMAR PALACE PHOOLBAGH

CHOURAHA (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER

(SHRI SHRINIVAS GAJENDRAGADKAR, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR

PETITIONER)

AND

1.

SUDAMA

PRASAD

S/O

SH

SUNDER

LAL

CHOBEY

, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, VILLAGE

MANGRONI SHIVPURI AT PRESENT RANGER

HOUSE

SINDE

KI

CHHA

W

ANI

LASHKAR

(MADHYA PRADESH)

2.

SMT HARKUNW

AR W/O SH. SUDAMA PRASAD

CHOBEY

,

AGED

ABOUT

70

YEARS, VILL.

MANGRONI,

DISTT

SHIVPURI

PRESENT

RANGER

HOUSE

SHINDE

KI

CHHA

W

ANI,

LASHKAR, GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)

3.

MAY

ANK CHOUBEY

S/O LATE SH. PURSOTTAM

CHOUBEY

,

AGED

ABOUT

23

YEARS, VILL.

MANGRONI, DISTT. SHIVPURI AT PRESENT

RANGER

HOUSE

SHINDE

KI

CHHA

W

ANI,

LASHKAR, GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)

4.

SUDAMA CHOUBEY

S/O LATE SH. PURSOTTAM

CHOUBEY

,

AGED

ABOUT

23

YEARS, VILL.

MANGRONI,

DISTT

SHIVPURI

PRESENT

RANGER

HOUSE

SHINDE

KI

CHHA

W

ANI,

LASHKAR, GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)

5.

KANHAIY

A

LAL

CHOUBEY

S/O

LATE

SH.

PURSOTTAM

CHOUBEY

,

AGED

ABOUT

18

YEARS, VILL. MANGRONI, SHIVPURI PRESENT

RANGER

HOUSE

SHINDE

KI

CHHA

W

ANI,

LASHKAR, GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)

6.

KAMAL SINGH S/O SH. CHANDAN SINGH, AGED

ABOUT 43 YEARS, VILL. MADIKHEDA, TEH.

NARWAR, SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS

(SHRI JITENDRA KUMAR SHARMA, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR

RESPONDENT [R-1])

This petition coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the

following:

Advocates:
Shrinivas Gajendragadkar,

ORDER

This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner-Insurance Company assailing the order dated 28.06.2022 passed in Case No.14/2022(Review) by Tenth Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Gwalior by which the application filed by the Insurance Company under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC seeking review of the compromise order passed by Lokadalat has been dismissed.

Learned counsel for the Insurance Company submits that without verifying the documents, Insurance Company entered into the compromise with respondents but subsequently when the permit and fitness of the insured vehicle were verified, the same were not found to be valid on the date of accident.

Thereafter Insurance Company filed application under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC seeking review of the compromise order passed by Lokadalat. Hence, petitioner-Insurance Company by way of present petition prays for setting aside the order dated 28.06.2022 and recalling of compromise order dated 11.12.2021. In support of the contention, learned counsel for Insurance Company has relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court rendered in State of Punjab and another Vs. Jalour Singh and Ors.

reported in 2008 AIR (SC) 1029.

Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the prayer made by petitioner-Insurance Company relying upon decision of Hob'ble Apex Court rendered in K.Srinivasappa and Ors. Vs. M.Mallamma and others 2022 SC Online SC 636.

Upon perusal of the judgment relied upon by the petitioner-Insurance Company, it appears that the said judgment was passed without consent of parties while in the present case compromise order was passed based on the mutual consent of both the parties. Hence, the judgment relied upon by the petitioner is of no avail.

Section 22E of The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 reads as under:-

    "22E. Award of Permanent Lok Adalat to be final -(1) Every award of the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act made either on merit or in terms of a settlement agreement shall be final and binding on all the parties thereto and on persons claiming under them.
    (2) Every award of the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act shall be deemed to be a decree of a civil court.
    (3) The award made by the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act shall be by a majority of the persons constituting the Permanent Lok Adalat.
    (4) Every award made by the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act shall be final and shall not be called in question in any original suit, application or execution proceedings.
    (5) The Permanent Lok Adalat may transmit any award made by it to a civil court having local jurisdiction and such civil court shall execute the order as if it were a decree made by that court."
    On going through the said provisions, it is clear that the award of Permanent Lok Adalat is neither appealable nor it can be called in question in original suit, application or execution proceeding. No provision or exceptional ground has been brought to my notice contrary to the said provision. Hence, learned court below has not committed any illegality in rejecting the application under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 151 of CPC filed by the petitioner-
    Insurance Company.
    This Misc. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
    (DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL) JUDGE ojha
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top