SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9619

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Kailash Narayan Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Shyam Narayan Vishwakerma,Advocate General

ORDER

1. This application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashment of FIR in Crime No.266/2019 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Chhatarpur, for offence under Sections 498-A/34 of IPC read with Section 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act as well as criminal proceedings initiated upon the aforesaid FIR.

2. Undisputed facts are that applicant no. 1 is the father-in-law, applicant no. 2 is the mother-in-law and applicant no. 3 is the husband of respondent no. 2. Respondent no. 2 lodged an FIR on 14.4.2019 alleging that she got married to applicant no. 3 on 9.3.2015. Immediately after the marriage, the applicants started demanding gold chain, four gold bangles and cash amount of Rs.3,20,000/- and on account of that, they used to harass her physically and mentally. They used to beat her and whenever, she informed her father about harassment, then her father came to Dabra, as well as went to Chennai and tried to convince the applicants but harassment of the respondent no. 2 continued. On 8.8.2018 her husband came to take her back, then father of respondent no. 2 also requested him not to harass her. Then he specifically informed that the articles which were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top