2021 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4767
1
M.Cr.C. No.18242 of 2021
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
BENCH GWALIOR
SB : Justice G.S. Ahluwalia
M.Cr.C. No. 18242 of 2021
Rajabeti Sakhwar and others
Vs.
Darshanlal Sakhwar and others
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri J.P. Mishra, Counsel for the applicants.
Shri Anand V. Bhardwaj, Counsel for the respondent No.1.
Shri C.P. Singh, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No.6 and 7/State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of hearing
: 29.06.2021
Date of judgment
: 07.07.2021
Whether approved for reporting
: Yes
Jai Prakash Mishra,Advocate General
(Passed on 07/07/2021)
This application under Section 482 of CrPC has been filed for
quashment of proceedings initiated under Section 145 of CrPC
registered as Case No. 121/145x21 pending in the Court of Sub-
Divisional Magistrate, Mehgaon, District Bhind.
2.
It is the case of the applicants that police Gormi District Bhind
has presented Istgasa No.01/21 under Section 145 before the Court
of SDM, Mehgaon, District Bhind on the allegation that the
applicants are owner and in possession of land bearing Survey No.
305/09, 306/04 and 306/1 situated in village Gormi District Bhind
and the respondent No. 2 are claiming ownership pleading that they
2
are Maurushi Krishak and in possession of the said land. Since both
the parties are claiming their possession over the said land, therefore,
there is possibility of breach. Accordingly, 26 bags of mustard were
also seized.
3.
It is the case of the applicants that the applicants had harvested
the mustard crops standing over the land in question and the same
was kept in the field. However, the respondent No. 8 in connivance of
the authorities and the private respondents unauthorizedly took away
the said mustard crop and kept in the Police Station without obtaining
the order of the SDO. It is also contended that the applicants have
submitted an application before the Superintendent of Police, Bhind
for return of the said mustard crops. However, no heed has been paid.
4.
Earlier the respondents No. 1 to 5 had filed a civil suit for
declaration of title, permanent injunction and for declaring the sale
deed dated 16.12.1992 as nullity and void, which was registered as
Civil Suit No.259-A/1998 (Ram Lal and others Vs. Laxmi Datt and
others). The said civil suit was dismissed by the Trial Court by
judgment and decree dated 22.12.2006 and it was found that the
applicants are in possession of the said land. Thereafter, the
respondents No. 1 to 5 filed Civil Appeal No. 15/2009, which was
also dismissed by the Appellate Court by judgment and decree dated
06.12.2010 and it was also held that the applicants are in possession
of the land. Thereafter, the respondents No. 1 to 5 filed second
appeal, which has been registered as Second Appeal No.158/2011
3
and by order dated 16.01.2013, this Court has directed the parties to
maintain status quo. It is contended that on earlier occasion also,
respondents No. 1 to 5 had filed a complaint No.8/2014x145CrPC
under Section 145 of CrPC, however, the said complaint was
dismissed by SDM, Mehgaon by order dated 23.05.2014 in the light
of the pendency of the civil suit. Thereafter, the respondent No. 4
lodged a FIR in Crime No.37/2013 against the applicants for offence
under Sections 379, 294, 447, 188, 506 of IPC. The said proceedings
were challenged by the applicants by filing an application under
Section 482 of CrPC, which was registered as M.Cr.C. No.2519/2013
and Crime No.37/2013 was quashed by this Court by order dated
27.04.2017. In the Istgasa also, the applicants have filed all the
documents before the SDM and prayed for dropping the proceedings.
However, neither the proceedings were dropped nor any order to
handover the crops of mustard has been passed. It is further alleged
that SDM, by order dated 22.03.2021 has directed the Revenue
Inspector and Patwari to file Panch Prativedan to the effect that as to
who is in possession of the land in dispute for the last two months.
5.
Respondents No. 1 to 5 have filed I.A. No.18406/2021 for
dismissal of petition. It is admitted that the civil dispute is pending
between the parties and S.A. No.158/2011 is pending before this
Court, which was admitted by order dated 16.01.2013 and the effect
and operation of the impugned judgment and decree has been stayed
and the parties have been directed to maintain status quo. Thereafter,