SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MP) 7552

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vijay Jain @ Bunty – Appellant
Versus
Firm Nathmal Tarachand Raanka Bada Bajar Ashta – Respondent


Advocates:
Vikas Mahawar,Advocate General

O R D E R

(Jabalpur, Dated : 04/10/2021)

Per: Sunita Yadav, J :

Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 31.08.2021 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Aashta, District Sehore in Criminal Appeal No.227/2019, whereby the judgment dated 08.08.2019 passed in SCNIA No.94/2018 by the Judicial Magistrate First Class Aashta, District Sehore has been affirmed, the present revision petition has been filed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that; on 16.02.2018, the accused/revisionist purchased gold bangles costing Rs. 2,91,479/- on credit. The accused/revisionist failed to make the payment, the complainant demanded the amount and thus on 17.03.2018 the accused handed a cheque bearing cheque No.00011 of RBL Bank, Mandoi Road Branch Aashta. The said cheque was deposited by the complainant on his account on 22.03.2018 and the said cheque was dishonoured due to insufficiency of funds in the account of revisionist. On 26.03.2018, a legal notice was sent through registered post but the same was returned with a note of refusal. Thus, a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed by the complainant. 3. The learned Trial court convicted the revisionist unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top