HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajesh Raghuvanshi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has
been filed seeking following reliefs:
i.
That, the impugned order dated 12.05.2018
(Annexure P/3), 03.04.2019 (Annexure P/2) and
14.02.2020 (Annexure P/1) passed by the
respondent authorities may kindly be set aside in
the interest of justice.
ii.
That, the respondent may be directed to
reinstated the petitioner in the service with all the
consequential benefit or in alternative remanded
back to the respondent to consider afresh the
stability of the petitioner on the basis of the merits
and not only because of the mere conviction in the
interest of justice.
Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court
deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the
case same may kindly be granted to the petitioner.
2.
The petitioner was working on the post of Jail Guard. He was tried
3
in a criminal case and ultimately he was convicted. The services of the
petitioner were terminated by order dated 12.5.2018 passed by Jail
Superintendent, Central Jail, Bhopal on the ground that the petitioner has
been convicted by judgment and sentence dated 08.12.2017 passed by
Special Judge, (Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act), Guna in
S.T.No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.