SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajesh Raghuvanshi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vibhor Kumar Sahu,Advocate General

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has

been filed seeking following reliefs:

i.

That, the impugned order dated 12.05.2018

(Annexure P/3), 03.04.2019 (Annexure P/2) and

14.02.2020 (Annexure P/1) passed by the

respondent authorities may kindly be set aside in

the interest of justice.

ii.

That, the respondent may be directed to

reinstated the petitioner in the service with all the

consequential benefit or in alternative remanded

back to the respondent to consider afresh the

stability of the petitioner on the basis of the merits

and not only because of the mere conviction in the

interest of justice.

Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court

deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the

case same may kindly be granted to the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner was working on the post of Jail Guard. He was tried

3

in a criminal case and ultimately he was convicted. The services of the

petitioner were terminated by order dated 12.5.2018 passed by Jail

Superintendent, Central Jail, Bhopal on the ground that the petitioner has

been convicted by judgment and sentence dated 08.12.2017 passed by

Special Judge, (Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act), Guna in

S.T.No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top