SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 24272

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ajit Prakash Jain – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Uma Shankar Jayaswal,Advocate General

ORDER

The present petition has been filed challenging the order Annexure-P/7 dated 10.05.2023 whereby the respondent/corporation has refused to extend the contractual service of the petitioner on the ground that the work and performance of the petitioner was not satisfactory.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the reasons are cryptic and the order is stigmatic. Such stigmatic order could not have been passed withoug adequate opportunity of hearing and without informing the ground for coming to conclusion as mentioned in the order Annexure-P/7. The learned counsel further relies on a judgment of Coordinate Bench passed in W.P No.12464/2023. It is further submitted that this case was filed by the employees whose contractual services were not extended by citing the same reasons and by the same order Annexure-P/7.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further relied upon a judgment passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P No.12464/2023 decided on 15.09.2023. The following has been held therein. "This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed against order dated 10.05.2023 by which respondent nos.2 to 7 have refused to extend contractual se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top