HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK
Dinesh Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that due to inadvertence, respondent No.2 has been referred as Superintendent of Police District Morena whereas correct parties is Collector, District Gwalior. He seeks permission of this Court to amend the cause title accordingly.
2 . Looking to the nature of prayer, in the interest of justice, prayer is allowed and learned counsel for petitioner is permitted to amend the cause title across the Board.
3 . After amendment being carried out, matter is heard finally with consent.
4 . The present petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking following reliefs:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.