HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
Mrs. Parul Jha – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioners seeking police protection as the petitioners who have solemnized marriage apprehend danger from the family members of petitioner no. 1. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners are major and on their free will have solemnize marriage and petitioner no. 1 wants to live with the petitioner no.2 but they apprehend that respondent no. 4 who is father of petitioner no. 1 may institute complaint against the petitioner no. 2 and in wake of such complaint, further apprehend that the police may harass them.
Per contra, learned Government Advocate on advance copy submits that on mere apprehension protection order cannot be issued by this Court, as from the entire averments made in the Writ Petition only apprehensions have been raised that the family members of petitioner no.1 may cause harm to both of them. Thus, prays for dismissal of the present petition. After hearing counsel for the parties and going through the record, prima facie this Court does not find any reason to allow the said petition and provide police protection to the peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.