SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 24113

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sheetal Motghare – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Arshad Ahmed Mansoori,0

ORDER

-2- The applicants have filed this Revision under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashment oforder dated 19.10.2023 whereby charges under Section 420/406 of theIPC & Section 6(1) of M.P. Nikshepkon Ke Hiton Ka Sanrakshan Adhiniyam have been framed against the applicants.

02. Facts of the case are that one Sourabh Gupta S/o SatishSarmandal resident of House No.110, Scheme No.136, Anand Vihar,Indore submitted a written compliant on 05.03.2022 to Additional Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch, Indore alleging that the present applicants are illegally running an advisory company without SEBI License and Gumasta License since last 5 – 6 month. He has also made a complaint against three other advisory companies. The said complaint was marked to Police Station - Khajrana, Indore and the Station HouseOfficer registered an F.I.R. against the present applicants and five othersunder Sections 420, 406 & 120-B of the IPC on 05.03.2020.

03. The police recorded the memorandum statement of the presentapplicants under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act on 07.03.2020, according to which they were working as partner in Swastic Investment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top