HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN, J
Ratnesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court discusses prosecution allegations (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. court's reasoning on acquittal (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. court sets aside rejection of candidature (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
(O R D E R)
(Reserved on : 11/12/2024)
(Pronounced on : 10/01/2025)
The present petition has been preferred challenging the order dated 01.01.2023 (Annexure P/11) and seeking a further direction to the respondents to give joining to the petitioner on the post of Constable (Driver).
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner appeared in the Police Constable Test-2012 conducted by the M.P. Professional Board and he qualified for the post of Constable (Driver). It is the case of the petitioner that he was not given joining on the post despite having qualified the written test as well as Trade Test. Later on it was found that the respondents have not given joining to the petitioner on account of a criminal case registered against Signature Not Verified him at Police Station Bhalumada, Tehsil- Kotma, District Anuppur at Crime No. 163/2009 under Sections 325 , 34 of IPC wherein he had been acquitted on the basis of comp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.