SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 852

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN, J
Ratnesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ankur Shrivastava,Advocate General

Table of Content
1. court discusses prosecution allegations (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. court's reasoning on acquittal (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
3. court sets aside rejection of candidature (Para 23 , 24 , 25)

(O R D E R)

(Reserved on : 11/12/2024)

(Pronounced on : 10/01/2025)

The present petition has been preferred challenging the order dated 01.01.2023 (Annexure P/11) and seeking a further direction to the respondents to give joining to the petitioner on the post of Constable (Driver).

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner appeared in the Police Constable Test-2012 conducted by the M.P. Professional Board and he qualified for the post of Constable (Driver). It is the case of the petitioner that he was not given joining on the post despite having qualified the written test as well as Trade Test. Later on it was found that the respondents have not given joining to the petitioner on account of a criminal case registered against Signature Not Verified him at Police Station Bhalumada, Tehsil- Kotma, District Anuppur at Crime No. 163/2009 under Sections 325 , 34 of IPC wherein he had been acquitted on the basis of comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top