HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT, CJ, SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, J, SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN, J
Anand – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
Per: Hon'ble Shri Justice S.A.Dharmadhikari
A. BACKGROUND FACTS LEADING TO PRESENT REFERENCE TO FULL BENCH
1. The State of Madhya Pradesh, in exercise of powers available under Sec. 41(3) issued the impugned Gazette notification on 24.09.2015, through which around initially 53 species of forest produce (used interchangeably for trees & plants) were exempted from the operation of the rigours of regulatory provisions under the Transit Rules. This notification initially comprised 53 species of forest produce, which included a large number of those species, which are stated to be present in abundance in the dense forests of Madhya Pradesh in various districts. Subsequently through another notification dated 11.04.2017, the aforesaid notification was amended to exclude another 9-10 species of forest produce from the rigours of Transit Rules.
2. A writ petition came to be instituted before the Indore Bench of this Court titled as ‘Anand vs State of M.P. and Ors.’ (W.P. No. 26802/ 2018), laying challenge to the impugned notification dated 24.09.2015 exempting 53 species. In the said writ petition, when the State failed to file a reply timely, this Court stayed th

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.