SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 23882

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
VISHAL DHAGAT
Komal Padme – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ramesh Kumar Tiwari,Advocate General

ORDER

Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of (VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE India making a prayer to issue direction/writ to respondents to call petitioner for counseling for post of Pharmacist Grade II.

2. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that petitioner was successful in examination, however, she was not called in counseling for reasons best known to respondents. It is further submitted that petitioner has preferred a representation but same has not been considered and decided.

3. Government Advocate appearing for the respondents/State submitted that representation filed by petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law.

4. Heard the counsel for the parties.

5. Considering aforesaid submissions made by counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, writ petition filed by petitioner is disposed off directing competent authority/respondent No.2/respondent No.4 to consider and decide the representation of petitioner within a period of 15 days from date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. Communication be sent to petitioner regarding result of representation. If petitioner is found

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top