HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Srashti Energy Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Authorised Officer Shailendra Singhal – Appellant
Versus
Ramgopal Verma – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
and decree dated 27/03/2023 by passing the impugned order dated 11/03/2024 without impleading all the parties of the suit in the appeal memo and not dismissing the appeal for non-joinder of necessary parties?
2) Whether, the learned appellate Court has erred in reversing the judgment and decree dated 27/03/2023 on the question of limitation ignoring the admission of the plaintiff witness and by over reaching its jurisdiction?
3) Whether, the learned appellate Court was legally correct in granting the rights arising through adverse possession in succession as per the Hindu Succession Act, 1956?
4) Whether, the learned appellate Court was justified in cancelling the registered sale deed dated 04/04/2014 executed in favour of the appellant by respondent No.6 - Pyarelal by declaring it as void without dealing with the question of loss and compensation caused to the appellant?
5) Whether, the learned appellate Court was legally correct in declaring the suit land as an ancestral property and the plaintiffs and all the successors of Mangilal as owner and possession holder of the so- called ancestral land without impleading necessary parties in the suit and in the appeal?"
Also hea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.