SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dr. Sunil Singh Baghel – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Prashant Singh,Advocate General

O R D E R

( 09/01/2017) The core issue to be decided in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is : whether the petitioner has any indefeasible and enforceable right to join on deputation as Dy. Director in the State Backward Class Commission ? 2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the petitioner is substantively holding the post of District Coordinator in Centre for Entrepreneurship Development. His parent department is Centre For Entrepreneurship Development of Madhya Pradesh (CEDMAP). The petitioner submitted his candidature pursuant to an advertisement published in“Rojgar Aur Nirman” on 15.09.2014. The petitionerpreferred an application on 04.10.2014 seeking permission of parent department to participate in the selection process pursuant to advertisement (Annexure-P/8). The permission was duly granted by the respondents by communication (Annexure-P/9) to (Annexure-P/11). The petitioner, after obtaining necessary permission, participated in the selection process and was selected and appointed as Dy. Director (ClassI) on deputation for a period of three years. The order dated 31.07.2015 (Annexure-P/1) shows the said appo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top