HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Karan – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
Principal Registrar of this court has submitted the report regarding verification of factum of compromise.The dispute has been amicably settled between both the parties and they have entered into compromise with their free will and there is no undue influence, pressure, force duress or coercion over the parties who entered into amicable settlement, but section 344 of IPC is compoundable and offence under section 363, 366, 376, 376(2)(n) of IPC and offences under sections 5(L)/6, 5(J)(ii) of POCSO Act are non compoundable.
2 With consent of both the parties, matter has been heard finally.
3 The petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.P.C.') for quashment of FIR dated 13.5.2021 arising out of Crime No. 176/2021 registered at Police Station Balakwada District Khargone under Sections 363, 366, 344, 376, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC'), section 5L, 6, 5J(ii) of POCSO Act and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
3- The facts of the case in brief are that on 12.5.2021 father of prosecutrix lodged a missing person report at Police station Balakwada by stating that his minor daughter/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.