SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3619

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Rishu Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Tapendra Sharma,Advocate General

ORDER

1. Petitioners are present in person before this court.

2 . In this petition, the petitioners inter alia seeking direction to the respondents to provide protection to them.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners, who are major, have married each other on their own volition. For establishing the age of petitioners No.1 and no.2, adhar-cards and mark-sheets have been produced. However, the respondents are harassing and victimizing the petitioners. It is further submitted that the instant petition may be disposed of with the direction to the Superintendent of Police, Gwalior and Superintendent of Police, Jhansi to provide protection to the petitioners. In support of his submission, learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance on the decision in Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and another, (2006) 5 SCC 475 and in the case of Shakti Vahini Vs. Union of India and Others, 2018 (7) SCC

192.

4. On the other hand, learned Government Advocate for the respondents No.1 to 4/State fairly submitted that in case petitioners approach the police authorities, suitable action in the matter shall be taken.

5. Taking into account the submissions made by learned coun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top