SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 10820

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Deepchand Johari – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashok Kumar Gupta,Advocate General

ORDER

Petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India making a prayer to quash order dated 19.02.2024 (Annexure-P/3)

passed by respondent No.4.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that petitioner has retired from service on 30.09.2023. Recovery of excess payment has been ordered against petitioner by order dated 19.02.2024. Case of petitioner is covered by Clause-1 and 4 of the judgment passed in case of State of Punjab and Ors. Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer), reported in (2015) 4 SCC 334.

3. Heard the counsel for petitioner.

4. Paragraph-18 of the judgment passed in case of Rafiq Masih (supra)

is quoted as under:- 18. It is not possible to postulate all situations of hardship, which would govern employees on the issue o f recovery, where payments have mistakenly been made by the employer, in excess of their entitlement. Be that as it may, based on the decisions referred to herein above, we may, as a ready reference, summarise the following few situations, wherein recoveries by the employers, would be impermissible in law:

(i) Recovery from employees belonging to Class-III and Class-IV service (or Group 'C' and Group 'D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top