SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3235

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Champalal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Avinash Zargar,Advocate General

    ORDER

    This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 08.05.2019 (Annexure P/1) passed in Civil Suit No.171-A/2017 by which the First Civil Judge Class-2, Khandwa (M.P.) has rejected two applications one under Order

XIII Rule 10 of CPC and the second under Order XVI Rule 1 of CPC.

2. relief of declaration of title, permanent injunction in respect of the suit lands detailed in the plaint. It has been pleaded that the alteration in revenue records in favour of plaintiff and in favour of respondents is fraudulent and the same has also been impugned in the suit. The defendants/respondents filed their written statement disputing declaration of the plaintiff/petitioner. During trial, the plaintiff/petitioner filed certified copies of proceedings of Revenue Case No.01/A-68/2017-18 which was granted to him. However, certified copies of the statements of witnesses were not granted to the plaintiff/petitioner for the reason that the same is not the public documents, therefore, the plaintiff filed an application under Order XIII Rule 10 of CPC seeking summoning of records and another application under Oder XVI Rule 1 of CPC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top