SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2361

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT, J
Devendra Kumar Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Mp – Respondent
MCRC 17241/2024



Advocates:
Satya Prakash Mishra,Advocate General

Bail applications are denied based on criminal antecedents and involvement in similar offences, while a lack of criminal history can lead to bail being granted.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20-B, 21, 22, 25, 25-A - M.P. Drug Control Act - Section 5/13 - Bail applications for offences under NDPS Act - Applicants Mohammad Talib and Azeem Khan denied bail due to criminal antecedents and involvement in similar offences; applicant Devendra Kumar Dwivedi granted bail as he was not present at the scene and had no criminal history. (Paras 2-6)

(B) Bail - Considerations for granting bail - The court considers the nature of the offence, criminal history, and presence at the crime scene in deciding bail applications. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The applicants sought bail for offences under the NDPS Act and M.P. Drug Control Act. Mohammad Talib and Azeem Khan were implicated based on a co-accused's memorandum and had prior criminal records. Devendra Kumar Dwivedi, the vehicle owner, claimed no involvement.

Findings of Court:
The bail applications of Mohammad Talib and Azeem Khan were dismissed due to their criminal history, while Devendra Kumar Dwivedi was granted bail with conditions.

Issues: The main issues were the applicants' criminal antecedents and their involvement in the alleged offences.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of criminal history and presence at the crime scene in bail considerations, allowing bail for the applicant without a criminal record.

Result: Bail application of Devendra Kumar Dwivedi allowed; others dismissed.

ORDER

These are the first bail applications filed on behalf of the applicants Mohammad Talib, Azeem Khan and Devendra Kumar Dwivedi under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail relating to FIR No. 309/2023, registered at Police Station-Govindgarh, District Rewa (M.P.) for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20-B, 21, 22, 25 and 25-A of NDPS Act and Section 5/13 of M.P. Drug Control Act. 2 . Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submitted that applicants Mohammad Talib and Azeem Khan was made accused on basis of memorandum given by co-accused person. They are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant Devendra Kumar Dwivedi submitted that he is owner of vehicle. His son Shivam Dubey has taken away his vehicle and he was caught on spot. Applicant does not have any role in the incident. In these circumstances, it is prayed that applicants may be released on bail.

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State opposed the applications for grant of bail. It is submitted that applicants Mohammad Talib and Azeem Khan are having criminal antecedents and as many as 4 cases are registered against them. They are also having antecedents for committing similar offence under NDPS Act. I n these circumstances, applicants may not be released on bail.

4. Heard the counsel for the parties.

5. Considering facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account criminal antecedents and earlier record of similar offence under NDPS Act, M.Cr.C. No. 14852/2024 filed by Mohammad Talib and M.Cr.C. No. 14847/2024 filed by Azeem Khan are dismissed. They are at liberty to file repeat application after examination of independent seizure witnesses in the Court.

6. Applicant Devendra Kumar Dwivedi is owner of the vehicle and was not present on spot. He does not have any other criminal antecedents. Considering the same, M.Cr.C. No. 17241/2024 filed by applicant Devendra Kumar Dwivedi is allowed.

7. It is directed that the applicant Devendra Kumar Dwivedi shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned for his regular appearance before Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this regard during pendency of trial.

8 . The applicant Devendra Kumar Dwiveid shall also abide by the following conditions of Section 437(3) of Cr. P. C. as under:- (a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this Chapter;

    (b) that such person shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected of the commission of which he is suspected and;
    (c) that such person shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

9. Certified copy as per rules. 

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top