HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ghanshyam Ptel @ Lallu – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
With the consent, finally heard.
This revision filed under Section 397/401 of the Criminal Procedure
Code (hereinafter referred as 'Cr.P.C.') takes exception to the order dated
29/06/2018 passed in Sessions Trial No.44/2017 by learned Second Additional
Sessions Judge, Umariya, whereby charge under Sections 467/120-B, 468/120-
B and 471/120-B of the Indian Penal Code are framed against the applicant.
Shri Manish Datt, learned Senior Advocate for the applicant by placing
1
reliance on the factual backdrop which is reproduced in the charge as well as in
the FIR urged that as per the case of prosecution, applicant's younger brother
Raghunath Patel by projecting himself to be present appellant and by using the
mark-sheet/documents of present applicant secured employment in South
Eastern Coalfields Limited (SECL). Accordingly, employer lodged the FIR on
27/06/2014 as Crime No.220/2014. On the basis of this FIR, the investigation
was conducted and ultimately the matter travelled to the Court and Court below
framed the charges on 29/06/2018.
Learned Senior Advocate submits that there is no independent charge
made under Section 120-B of IPC against the applicant. A Division Bench of
this Court in Criminal Ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.