HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SMT. JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV, J
Vasimullah Pathan – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail relating to Crime No. 29 of 2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Guna (M.P.) for the offence under Section 392 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that applicant is innocent and h a s been falsely implicated. FIR is registered against unknown persons, however, T.I.P. has not been conducted. Under these circumstances, prosecution story in respect to present applicant becomes doubtful in the light of the fact that as per prosecution story, person who committed offence came with is face covered with a cloth. It is further argued that applicant is in custody since 01.2.2024. After conclusion of investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no requirement of further custodial interrogation of the applicant. Further argument is that applicant is the permanent resident of District Guna (M.P.) and there is no possibility of his absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence. Hence, prayed for grant of bail to the applicant. On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent/State opposed the bail application citing cr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.