SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 13180

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SMT. JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV, J
Vasimullah Pathan – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Prabodh Pareek,Advocate General

ORDER

This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail relating to Crime No. 29 of 2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Guna (M.P.) for the offence under Section 392 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that applicant is innocent and h a s been falsely implicated. FIR is registered against unknown persons, however, T.I.P. has not been conducted. Under these circumstances, prosecution story in respect to present applicant becomes doubtful in the light of the fact that as per prosecution story, person who committed offence came with is face covered with a cloth. It is further argued that applicant is in custody since 01.2.2024. After conclusion of investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no requirement of further custodial interrogation of the applicant. Further argument is that applicant is the permanent resident of District Guna (M.P.) and there is no possibility of his absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence. Hence, prayed for grant of bail to the applicant. On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent/State opposed the bail application citing cr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top