SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 13188

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SMT. JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV, J
Adil Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Anshu Gupta,Advocate General

ORDER

This is first application filed by the applicants under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail relating to Crime No. 178 of 2024 registered at Police Station - Kotwali, District Guna (M.P.) for the offence under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act.

Allegation against the present applicant is that 20.40 grams of Smack has been seized from the possession of present applicant.

Learned counsel for the applicant/accused argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. It is further argued that the mandatory provision of Section 50 of NDPS Act has not been complied with while seizing the contraband. The option of search by Police Officer has also been given. Seized smack does not come within the purview of commercial quantity.

Further argument is that the applicant is in custody since 10.03.2024. It is further argued that investigation is almost complete. The applicant is permanent resident of District Baran (Rajasthan). Conclusion of trial is likely to take time and there is no likelihood of his absconsion, if released on bail. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

P e r contra, learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State vehemently opposed th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top