SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 13235

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE ROOPESH CHANDRA VARSHNEY, J
Ramhazoor Dangi – Appellant
Versus
Mannu Lal Rajak – Respondent


Advocates:
Pradeep Kumar Shrivastava,Advocate General

ORDER

T h i s appeal under Section of CPC is directed by appellants/defendants against the concurring judgment and decree dated 29/1/2021 passed by Second Additional District Judge, Datia in Civil Appeal No.17/2019 confirming the judgment and decree dated 26/2/2019 passed by Fourth Civil Judge, Class II, Datia in Civil Suit No.178-A/2016. The Suit filed by respondent No. 1/plaintiff seeking permanent injunction was decreed. 2 . Facts necessary for disposal of this appeal are to the effect that respondent No. 1/plaintiffs filed a suit seeking permanent injunction against appellants and respondent No. 2/State pleadings that he is bhumiswami of land bearing survey no. 1519 area 0.14 hectare, 1524 area 0.10 hectare and survey no. 1528 area 0.36 hectare situate at village Imaliya, District Datia and is continuously cultivating the land and harvesting crops since the time of his forefathers. He further pleaded that his name has already been entered in revenue record. It is alleged that land of defendants is situate just adjacent to his land and they are trying to dispossess him and therefore, on his request demarcation of land was done by Revenue Inspector in case No. 18-A/2009-10. It

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top