HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Raju @ Vijay – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
(Passed on 10.06.2021)
Appellant has filed the present appeal under section 14(A)(2) of
the Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act
(for short 'the SC/ST Act') being aggrieved by the order dated
16.09.2020 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Rajgarh
whereby the application filed by the accused seeking declaration that
he is “child in conflict with law” and his trial be sent to Board was
rejected.
Facts of the case in short are as under:
2.
An FIR was registered against the appellant under sections 363,
366, 376-B, 376(2) of the IPC read with section 5 & 6 of the
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and 3(2)(v) of the
SC/ST Act and he was arrested. The investigation was completed and
charge sheet has been filed before the Special Session Judge . In the
charge sheet his age is declared as 19 years at the time of commission
of offence on 25.12.2019.
3.
Appellant/accused filed an application asserting that at the time
of commission of the offence he was below 16 years of age i.e.
juvenile, therefore, his trial be sent to the juvenile Court/ board. In
-3-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.