Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
B.K. Shrivastava, J
Ram Kishore Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court’s observations confirm substantial evidence against the appellant amid inconsistent claims. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 2. arguments revolve around lack of definitive entrustment and involvement of other staff. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. need for evidentiary clarity in establishing guilt under criminal breach of trust. (Para 13) |
| 4. revised sentencing due to personal circumstances and already served time. (Para 14 , 16) |
(JUDGMENT)
23.06.2021
This appeal has been filed under section 374(2) of CrPC on 23.11.2009 by appellant Ram Kishore Dwivedi against the judgment dated 1.10.2009 passed by the Third Additional Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur in Sessions Trial No.168/2008. The trial court convicted the appellant for the offence under section 409 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo 3 years rigorous imprisonment with the fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulations.
2. It is submitted by the counsel for appellant that the trial court grossly erred in convicting the appellant. The findings of the trial court are perverse and contrary to facts and law, therefore, liable to be set aside. There are so many omissions and contradictions in the evidence of prosecution witnesses. The registration fees was d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
