SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6789

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ranchod Jirati – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Akshat Pahadia,Advocate General

Post for

13.09.2021

-

(Subodh Abhyankar)

Judge

3

High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur

Bench at Indore

Agriculturist,

104, Sawarkar Path,Ward No.11,

Anjad, District Barwani (MP)

House Wife & Councillor, 36/1, Sirvi Mohalla, Ward No.3,

Anjad, District Barwani (MP)

Ministry of Urban Development & Housing Department,

Through Principal Secretary, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal

The State Election Commission

Through Secretary,

Nirwachan Bhawan, Bhopal

The Collector,

Office of Collector, Barwani

District Barwani MP)

* * * * *

Shri Veer Kumar Jain, learned Senior Counsel along with Shri Akshat Paha-

dia, learned counsel for the petitioners.

Shri Pushyamitra Bhargava, learned Additional Advocate General for re-

spondents No.1 and 3 / State of Madhya Pradesh.

Shri Kamal Airen, learned counsel for respondent No.2 / State Election Com-

mission, Bhopal.

Shri Abhinav P. Dhanodkar, learned counsel for intervener (Smt. Manjulata

w/o Rakesh Patidar, President, Nagar Parishad, Anjad, District Barwani, r/o

Patel Nagar, Anjad, District Barwani MP).

* * * * *

O R D E R

(Passed on this 13th day of September, 2021)

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

has been filed by the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top