SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anusuiya Daharwal – Appellant
Versus
Govind Ram @ Tappu – Respondent


Advocates:
Ajay Kumar Jain,Advocate General

The applicant-complainant has filed this criminalrevision under Section 397 r.w. 401 of the Cr.P.C. againstthe order dated 16.09.2016 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge Varaseoni, District Balaghatunder Section 228(1)(a) Cr.P.C. in Sessions TrialNo.2400134/2016. 2. The short facts of the case are that in the night of04.02.2016, applicant-complainant Anusuiya aged about 48 years was sleeping with her grand daughter in herhouse situated in village Kankigaya. At about 11:00 p.m. she heard noise of people and sound of stone-pelting coming from outside of her house. As a result, she woke up and came out of her house. She saw that respondent Nos.1 to 5/accused persons namely, Govind Ram @ Tappu, Damodar, Ravindra @ Sonu, Alam Singh and Devkibai were standing in front of her house. Seeing her, they shouted a torrent of abuse at her and told her that she had illegally constructed a house. They further told her threateningly that she had no right to live therein.

She requested them not to abuse her. Thereafter, they physically assaulted her with lathis and shoes. Later on, respondents-accused persons namely, Ravindra @ Sonu and Alam Singh t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top