HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anusuiya Daharwal – Appellant
Versus
Govind Ram @ Tappu – Respondent
The applicant-complainant has filed this criminalrevision under Section 397 r.w. 401 of the Cr.P.C. againstthe order dated 16.09.2016 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge Varaseoni, District Balaghatunder Section 228(1)(a) Cr.P.C. in Sessions TrialNo.2400134/2016. 2. The short facts of the case are that in the night of04.02.2016, applicant-complainant Anusuiya aged about 48 years was sleeping with her grand daughter in herhouse situated in village Kankigaya. At about 11:00 p.m. she heard noise of people and sound of stone-pelting coming from outside of her house. As a result, she woke up and came out of her house. She saw that respondent Nos.1 to 5/accused persons namely, Govind Ram @ Tappu, Damodar, Ravindra @ Sonu, Alam Singh and Devkibai were standing in front of her house. Seeing her, they shouted a torrent of abuse at her and told her that she had illegally constructed a house. They further told her threateningly that she had no right to live therein.
She requested them not to abuse her. Thereafter, they physically assaulted her with lathis and shoes. Later on, respondents-accused persons namely, Ravindra @ Sonu and Alam Singh t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.