SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(MP) 597

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vikas Arya – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr – Respondent


Advocates:
Prashant Sharma,Advocate General

Shri Prashant Sharma, counsel for the applicants.

Shri R.D. Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.1.

Shri A.K. Dwivedi, counsel for the respondent No.2.

This petition under Section 482 of CrPC has been filed for quashing the FIR in Crime No.249/2013 registered by Police Station Joura, District Morena for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 506, 323, 427 of IPC as well as under Section 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and all the consequent proceedings pending before the Court of JMFC, Morena.

The necessary facts for the disposal of the present application are that a complaint was made by the complainant/respondent No.2 on 16.05.2013 that the engagement of the complainant had taken place with the applicant No.1 on 12th June, 2011 and the father of the complainant had spent Rs.2.5 lacs and Rs.1 lac in cash was given. Thereafter, the applicants and other relatives started demanding money and they were demanding Rs.8 lacs in cash and as the father of the complainant was not in a position to fulfill their demand, therefore, they refused for marriage which was scheduled on 12th February, 2012, because of that, the complainant had lodged a FIR against the applicants and their relative

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top