SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6083

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Inder Singh And Anr. – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
,A.G.

ORDER

This appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the judgment dated 30.07.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge (Electricity Act), District Indore in S.T.No.1006/2009. By the impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted the appellants/accused for the offence under Section 25(1-B) (A) of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo 1 year R.I. each with fine of Rs.1000/-

    each with default stipulation.

2 . Being aggrieved by the impugned judgment, the appellants filed this appeal on the ground that the trial Court failed to see that there is no evidence on record to prove that accused was guilty. There are material contradictions and omissions in the statement of the prosecution witnesses. The Investigating Officer was unable to prove that seized Country made Pistol and Katta were sealed on his part and put in proper way in Malkhana. The independent witness turned hostile and did not support the prosecution case. On these grounds, prays for setting aside the impugned judgment and acquittal of the appellant.

3 . The trial Court framed charges against the appellants, which was denied by the appellan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top