HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Inder Singh And Anr. – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
This appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the judgment dated 30.07.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge (Electricity Act), District Indore in S.T.No.1006/2009. By the impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted the appellants/accused for the offence under Section 25(1-B) (A) of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo 1 year R.I. each with fine of Rs.1000/-
2 . Being aggrieved by the impugned judgment, the appellants filed this appeal on the ground that the trial Court failed to see that there is no evidence on record to prove that accused was guilty. There are material contradictions and omissions in the statement of the prosecution witnesses. The Investigating Officer was unable to prove that seized Country made Pistol and Katta were sealed on his part and put in proper way in Malkhana. The independent witness turned hostile and did not support the prosecution case. On these grounds, prays for setting aside the impugned judgment and acquittal of the appellant.
3 . The trial Court framed charges against the appellants, which was denied by the appellan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.