2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 13046
1 W.P.No.31000/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
ON THE 22nd OF DECEMBER, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 31000 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
RAM PRATAP S/O SHRI KUNDAN LAL, AGED
ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: ADOPTED
SON
OF
LATE
JAWAHARLAL
OCC.
UNEMPLOYED R/O VILLAGE BONDER TEHSIL
BAJAG
DISTRICT
DINDORI
(MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI ANUBHAV SINGHAL - ADVOCATE )
AND
1.
THE
STATE
OF
MADHYA
PRADESH
THROUGH
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
SCHOOL
EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT
VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2.
COLLECTOR,
DINDORI
DISTRICT
DINDORI (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.
BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, BLOCK
KARANJIYA
DISTRICT
DINDORI
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4.
DISTRICT
EDUCATION
OFFICER,
DINDORI DISTRICT DINDORI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
5.
PRINCIPAL,
GOVERNMENT
HIGHER
SECONDARY
SCHOOL
KURKHURI
DADAR,
RAIYTWAR
BLOCK
DEVELOPMENT
KARANJIYA
DISTRICT
DINDORI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI SWAPNIL GANGULY – DEPUTY ADVOCTE GENERAL )
………………………………………………………………………………………
2 W.P.No.31000/2023
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed
the following:
Ghanshyam Sharma,Advocate General
An adoption deed is not valid unless it complies with the requirements of Section 11 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, including the requirement that the child be actually given and taken in adoption.
Headnote:
COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT - ADOPTED SON - SUMMARY
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to give him compassionate appointment on the ground that he was the adopted son of a deceased government employee. The petitioner submitted an adoption deed as proof of his adoption.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the adoption deed relied upon by the petitioner was not valid in the light of Section 11 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, as there was no evidence that the petitioner was actually given and taken in adoption by the deceased employee.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to compassionate appointment on the basis of the adoption deed.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 11 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 requires that the child to be adopted must be actually given and taken in adoption by the parents or guardian concerned with intent to transfer the child from the family of its birth to the family of its adoption.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed as the petitioner failed to prove that he was legally adopted by the deceased employee.
This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has
been filed seeking the following reliefs :-
“(i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus to
direct
the
respondents
to
give
compassionate
appointment to the petitioner on suitable post being the
adopted son of Late Jawaharlal.
(ii) To grant any other relief, which this Hon’ble
Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case including cost of the litigation
in favour of the petitioner.”
2.
It is submitted by counsel for petitioner that petitioner was
adopted by Shri Late Jawaharlal. Shri Jawaharlal was working as
Peon in Government Higher Secondary School Khurkhuri Dadar,
Raiytwar, Block Development Karanjiya, District Dindori. He died
in harness on 16.01.2020 and adoption deed was also executed. As
per the policy for appointment on compassionate ground even an
adopted son is entitled for compassionate appointment. Although the
petitioner has made an application for his appointment on
compassionate ground but no heed has been paid.
3.
Considered the submissions made by counsel for petitioner.
4.
Section 11 of The Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956
reads as under :-
“11.Other conditions for a valid adoption.―In
every adoption, the following conditions must be
complied with:―
3 W.P.No.31000/2023
(i) if the adoption is of a son, the adoptive father
or mother by whom the adoption is made must not have
a Hindu son, son’s son or son’s son’s son (whether by
legitimate blood relationship or by adoption) living at
the time of adoption;
(ii) if the adoption is of a daughter, the adoptive
father or mother by whom the adoption is made must
not have a Hindu daughter or son’s daughter (whether
by legitimate blood relationship or by adoption) living
at the time of adoption;
(iii) if the adoption is by a male and the person to
be adopted is a female, the adoptive father is at least
twenty-one years older than the person to be adopted;
(iv) if the adoption is by a female and the person
to be adopted is a male, the adoptive mother is at least
twenty-one years older than the person to be adopted;
(v) the same child may not be adopted
simultaneously by two or more persons;
(vi) the child to be adopted must be actually
given and taken in adoption by the parents or guardian
concerned or under their authority with intent to
transfer the child from the family of its birth [or in the
case of an abandoned child or a child whose parentage
is not known, from the place or family where it has
been brought up] to the family of its adoption:
Provided that the performance of datta homam
shall not be essential to the validity of adoption”
5.
Thus, it is clear that apart from other conditions, the child to be
adopted must be actually given and taken in adoption by the parents
or guardian concerned or under their authority with intent to transfer
the child from the family of its birth or in the case of an abandoned
child or a child whose parentage is not known from the place or
4 W.P.No.31000/2023
family where it has been brought up to the family of its adoption.
Therefore, handing over and taking over the actual custody of the
child is essential.
6.
The petitioner has filed a copy of adoption deed as Annexure
P-2, in which it is stated by Jawaharlal that his wife has deserted her.
He has three daughters. The eldest daughter Laxmi Bai is married;
whereas remaining two daughters are residing with him. He has no
male child and in absence of male child there is nobody to take his
family further and accordingly with the consent of parents as well as
relatives of natural parents of petitioner, the petitioner has been kept
by him as his adopted son since he was 10 years of age. The
petitioner shall be having all the rights in his moveable and
immoveable property and he will also be entitled