HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Sandhya Sharma – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
With the consent, finally heard.
This intra Court appeal takes exception to order dated
01.02.2023 passed in W.P. No. 2268 of 2023 whereby learned
Single Judge has issued notices to the respondents and granted
limited conditional interim protection to the appellant.
2.
The appellant is aggrieved to the extent learned Single Judge
has declined to grant interim protection against the direction to
register the first information report (FIR).
3.
The relevant facts are that appellant/petitioner was a
Surpanch till 2020. The specified authority/CEO, Jila Panchayat
Satna (respondent No.3) passed an order dated 02.01.2023 whereby
a recovery was imposed on the petitioner and in addition, the CEO
Janpad Panchayat Maihar was directed to lodge a FIR against the
petitioner and the other persons concerned.
3
4.
Shri Ajay Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that impugned order was passed in exercise of power
under Section 92 of the Panchayat Raj and Gram Swaraj
Adhiniyam, 1993 (Adhiniyam). Sub Section 4 of Section 92 makes
it clear that principles of natural justice are codified in the shape of
Sub Section 4 of Section 92.
5.
The two folds submissions raised are tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.