SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 13739

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Deepsingh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vivek Phadke,Advocate General

Petitioner has preferred this revision petition under Section 397

read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C., being aggrieved by the judgment

dated 14.05.2020 passed by learned Fourth Additional Sessions

Judge, Shujalpur, District Shajapur, in Criminal Appeal No.385/2015

whereby learned appellate Court has set aside the judgment dated

08.10.2015 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shujalpur,

District Shajapur, in Criminal Case No.1457/2011 and remitted the

case back to the trial Court for re-examining the prosecution witness

under Section 311 of Cr.P.C and to pass a reasoned and cogent order.

2.

In order to decide this criminal revision, brief facts of the case is

that the petitioners were tried by the Judicial Magistrate First Class,

Shujalpur, District Shajapur and after considering the evidence available

on record the petitioner no.1 was convicted under Sections 419, 120(B)

of I.P.C, sentenced to undergo 1 year R.I., and fine of Rs.100/- with

default stipulations and petitioner no.2 was convicted for offence under

Section 120(B) of IPC, 3(d)4 of M.P. Manyata Prapt Parisksha

Adhiniyam 1937, sentenced to undergo 1 year and 1 year R.I. and fine

of Rs.100/- under each sections, with d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top