GWALIOR BENCH
RAMPRAKASH SINGH SIKARWAR (DEAD) THR LITS LEGAL HEIRS SMT. NIRMALA SIKARWAR – Appellant
Versus
SARDAR JAI SINGH JADHAV – Respondent
WP 927 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
ON THE 16th OF JANUARY, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 927 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
1.
RAMPRAKASH SINGH SIKARWAR (DEAD) THR.
ITS LEGAL HEIRS
1. SMT. NIRMALA SIKARWAR W/O LATE SHRI
RAMPRAKASH SINGH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
NEAR PANI KI TANKI SHIVAJI NAGAR AMKHO
LASHKAR GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.
RAMPRAKASH
SINGH
SIKARWAR
(DEAD)
THROUGH ITS LEGAL HEIRS 2. SUDARSHAN
SINGH SIKARWAR S/O LATE SHRI RAMPRAKASH
SINGH SIKARWAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NEAR
PANI
KI
TANKI
SHIVAJI
NAGAR
AMKHO
LASHKAR GWALIOR M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI K.S.TOMAR - SR.ADVOCATE WITH SHRI J.S.KAURAV -
ADVOCATE )
AND
1.
SARDAR JAI SINGH JADHAV S/O SHRI SARDAR
SINGH D.K. JADHAV R/O JAI VIHAR BAHODAPUR
GWALIOR, (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.
SARDAR DHANANJAY JADAV S/O SARDAR SHRI
D.K. JADHAV R/O JAI VIHAR BAHODAPUR
GWALIOR M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.
SMT. ASHA SIKARAWAR W/O SHRI MALKHAN
SINGH SIKARWAR D/O LATE SHRI RAMPRAKASH
SIKARWAR
R/O
PRASAD
NAGAR
HAZIRA
GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.
SMT. SUMAN SIKARWAR W/O SHRI MAANPAL
SINGH PAWAIYA D/O LATE SHRI RAMPRAKASH
SINGH SIKARWAR KARTAR ENCALVE, BEHIND
INDRALOK GARDEN, GUDI GUDA KA NAKA
LASHKAR GWALIOR M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
1
5.
SHER SINGH SIKARWAR S/O SHRI RAMPRAKASH
SINGH
SIKARWAR R/O
IN
FRONT
OF
SIDDHDHAM TEMPLE SHIVAJI NAGAR AMKHO
LASHKAR GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)
6.
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE
COLLECTOR DISTRICT GWALIOR M.P. GWALIOR
M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI C.P.SINGH - GOVT. ADVOCATE ON ADVANCE NOTICE)
This petition coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
Present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been
preferred against order dated 14.12.2022 whereby, the stay previously granted
by the Appellate Court i.e. Addl. Commissioner, has been vacated by the
impugned order just on the ground that the counsel for the petitioner/appellant
had sought time for final arguments.
Learned Sr.Advocate Shri Tomar submitted that in the appeal which is
pending before Addl. Commissioner, there was substantial question of law
involved as to whether the appeal could be maintainable against a dead person
and in that context, whether the order passed by SDO is sustainable in law and
instead of deciding the same, on a flimsy ground, stay was vacated.
A limited prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioner that if the
appellate authority is directed to decide the appeal in time bound frame while
maintaining the status quo between the parties with regard to the disputed
property, his grievance would be redressed.
Looking to the short controversy involved in the matter and innocuous
prayer made by learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed
of with a direction to the appellate authority i.e. Additional Commissioner to
2
(MILIND RAMESH PHADKE)
JUDGE
decide the appeal on merits as expeditiously as possible preferably within a
period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
Till then, the parties are directed to maintain status quo with regard to the
disputed property.
This Court makes it clear that it had not made any observation on merits
of the case.
With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.
Rks
3
RAM KUMAR SHARMA
2023.01.16 19:05:32 +05'30'
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.