SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 54126

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Pushpendra Thakur – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Jafar Khan,Advocate General

ORDER

This is the first bail application filed on behalf of the applicant/accused under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail, as he is under apprehension of his arrest, in connection with Crime No.196/2023, registered at Police Station Govindpura, District Bhopal (M.P.) for the offences punishable under Sections 389, 294, 323, 506, 34, 394, 450, 170, 120-B and 201 of Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent. He is General Manager of hotel Mohit Regency. It is submitted that (VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE main accused person namely, Rahul Giri came to his hotel and has swapped the credit card of complainant and has withdrawn the money. It is submitted that applicant does not have any role in the crime. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that after swapping the card Rs.1,20,000/- was withdrawn from the account and some money was returned to co-accused person after deducting the booking charges of hotel. In these circumstances, applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

3. Learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State opposed the application for grant of anticipatory bail. It is submitted t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top