HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Jagdish Prasad Pandey – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
Heard on the question of admission.
2. This Second appeal under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code (for brevity, CPC) has been filed by the appellant (hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff”) against the respondents (hereinafter referred to as “defendants”) being aggrieved the impugned judgment and decree dated 12.01.2021 passed by the 2nd Additional District Judge, Sidhi in RCA No. 63A/2018 confirming the Judgment and decree dated 22.11.2017 passed by Second Civil Judge, Class – II, Churhat District-Sindhi in Civil Suit No. 75A/2016.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff that the learned Courts below has erred in law as well as in facts in dismissing the appeal by the appellant/plaintiff by affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court and by ignoring the provisions of Section 2(Gha), 3 and 7 of the Vindhya Pradesh Malgujari Tatha Keshtkari Adhiniyam, 1953 and also ignoring the provisions of Sections 57, 157, 158 and 248 of MP Land Revenue Code, 1959 as the appellant/plaintiff was in possession of the suit property since prior to the year of 1953, It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.