SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1921

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI, J
Kanchan Jeevnani – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Mohammad Ibrahim,Advocate General

ORDER

Having regard to the similitude of controversy involved in these petitions, they are being disposed off by this common order. On the joint consent and prayerfrom the consel of the parties facts have been taken from M.Cr.C.No.6312/2025 (Nitin Jeevnani Vs. State of M.P. and others).

2. These petitions have been preferred under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter for short referred as, 'BNSS') for quashment of order dated 07.12.2024 (Annexure A-1) passed in UNCR No.6107/2024 by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, FIR No.1354/2024 dated 09.12.2024 (Annexure A-2) registered at police station Lasudia and subsequent proceedings for offence as follows with their equivalent sections of IPC against the petitioners in the instant petitions:

Offence under BNSEquivalent Sections of IPC
318(4)420
338467
336(3)468
340(2)471
61(2)120-B
115(2)323
126(2)341
127(2)342
331(6)458
351(3)506
140(3)365
310(2)395
316(2)406
316(5)409
3(5)34

3. The facts as emanating from the complaint filed on behalf of the respondent No.2 - complainant Gaurav Ahlawat in brief are that he is Founder, former Director and 99% share holder of the Company GRV Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. and remaining 1% share ho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top