SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 411

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT, J
Mohd. Sheem Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
CRA 3493/2024



Advocates:
Kuldeep Singh,Advocate General

A second criminal appeal against the same order is not maintainable unless new facts are presented.

Headnote:(A) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 14-A - Criminal Procedure Code - Second criminal appeal for bail - Appellant arrested for serious offences under IPC and SC/ST Act - Previous appeal against the same order was rejected - Court held that appeal against the same order is not maintainable as no new facts were presented. (Paras 1-7)

(B) Appeal - Maintainability - A second appeal on the same grounds as a previously dismissed appeal is not permissible unless new facts are introduced. (Paras 6)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was arrested on 10.09.2023 for serious offences and filed a second appeal for bail against an order dated 22.09.2023, which had previously been dismissed.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the second appeal was not maintainable as it did not present new facts.

Issues: The main issue was whether a second appeal against the same order is maintainable without new facts.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that a second appeal on the same grounds as a previously dismissed appeal is not permissible unless new facts are introduced.

Result: Criminal appeal filed by appellant is dismissed.

ORDER

This is second criminal appeal filed on behalf of the appellant under Section 14-A of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for grant of bail against order dated 22.09.2023 passed by Special Sessions Judge (SC/ST Act), Umaria (MP) passed in B.A. No. 281/2023.

2. Appellant has been arrested on 10.09.2023 in connection with FIR No. 395/2023, registered at Police Station Indwar, District Umaria for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 r/w 34 of IPC and Section 3(1)(w)(I) and 3(2)(5 ka) and 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for State raised objection that second criminal appeal against the same order passed by trial Court is not maintainable.

4. Appellant has filed appeal against order dated 22.09.2023. Against the said order, earlier also appellant has filed Criminal Appeal No. 13115/2023 before this Court for grant of bail. Said appeal was considered and rejected vide order dated 22.11.2023. Against the said order, appellant has again filed appeal before this Court.

5. Counsel appearing for appellant has relied upon judgment dated 29.11.2023 passed by coordinate Bench in Cr.A. No. 13238/2023, Salim Khan vs The State of Madhya Pradesh and another, wherein it has been stated that appeal against the same order is maintainable.

6. Appellant has not stated any new facts. On same old grounds on which his earlier appeal has been dismissed, fresh criminal appeal against the same order is not maintainable.

7. Criminal appeal filed by appellant is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top