SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1792

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Shri Amitabh Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vipin Yadav,Advocate General

ORDER

Apprehension of arrest has given rise to filing of this first application on behalf of the applicant under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail, in connection with Crime No.51/2022 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Narsinghpur (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Section 376, 376(2)(N), 328, 506 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant sanguinely submits that the incrimination of the applicant in the alleged crime is nothing but a fallacy inasmuch as false allegation of developing physical relation by the applicant with prosecutrix that too without her consent, has been made. Focusing on FIR (Annexure-A/10), learned counsel for the applicant submits it is basically a case of consent. Justifying the innocence of applicant, he submits that the incident had occurred on 30.11.2017 and the complainant herself has admitted that she allowed the applicant to stay in her house and even after committing rape, the complainant got appointed the applicant in her school where she is Principal.

Giving a deep dent to multifarious allegations made against the applicant, learned counsel submits that it lacks any sequence and therefo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top