SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 5559

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vijay – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Mahendra Singh Gurjar,Advocate General

These appeals have been filed by the appellants/accused persons

u/S 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, arising out of

3

common judgement dated 02.03.2020 passed by the Additional Sessions

Judge (Special Court, Electricity Act), Indore, in S.T. No.178/2018,

whereby the appellants/accused persons have been convicted u/S

364/34, 307/34 and 201/34 of IPC and sentenced each of them to

undergo RI for 10 years with fine of Rs.1,000/-, RI for 10 years with fine

of Rs.1,000/- and RI for 03 years with fine of Rs.1,000/- respectively

with default stipulations.

2.

Facts of the prosecution case in brief are that Mohit (PW/1) has

two sons, injured Mridul (PW/2) is elder and Gurvinder (PW/3) is the

younger. Mridul (PW/2) and Gurvinder (PW/3) used to study and live in

208, Clerk Colony, Indore in a rented room. Their room partner was

Sourabh Sen (PW/5). There was friendship between Anjali and injured

Mridul (PW/2). Rahul Ratnakar (PW/9) is the elder brother of appellant

Akash. Appellant Piyush @ Rohit Pareta is relative and appellant Vijay

is friend of appellant Akash. Gurvinder (PW/3) had gone back to his

house as his exams were over. On 07.01.2018 at around 11 AM, Mridul

told Soura

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top