SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 5553

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Anita – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Rohit Kumar Mangal,Advocate General

As the controversy involved in these petitions is identical,

therefore, they are being decided by this common order. For the sake of

convenience, the facts narrated in W.P. No.11153/2022 are taken into

consideration.

The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by an order

dated 25.4.2022 passed by Collector, Dewas u/s. 165(6) of the M.P.

Land Revenue Code, 1959 and also against the show-cause notice

dated 28.4.2022 issued by the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Sub

Division Dewas, District Dewas.

Facts of the case

1.

According to the petitioner, land bearing Survey No. 258 area

1.914 Hect. situated at Village Rasulpura was recorded in the name of

- : 11 :-

Shaukat Ali which is evident from Khasra Panchsala. The said land was

sold to M/s. Quality Bricks by Shaukat Ali on 14.6.1978. On 15.1.1982

it was sold M/s. Quality Bricks to M/s. Pricission Machinery Co. Pvt.

Ltd. Accordingly, the name of the purchasers were mutated in the

Khasra Panchsala and that continued up to 1992-93. Vide sale-deed

dated 15.4.1997 the said land was sold by M/s. Pricission Machinery

Co. Pvt. Ltd. to Smt. Manju Agrawal and accordingly her name was

mutated in the revenue record, and it continued up to 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top