SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1492

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashish Tiwari,Advocate General

ORDER

Notice has been served on prosecutrix.

Applicant has filed this first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. He is in Jail since 9.1.2023 in connection with Crime No. 476/2022 registered at P.S. - Ghattiya District Ujjain (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Section 370(a), 376(f)(n), 34, 120B of IPC and Section 5D/6 of POCSO Act and Section 9,10,11 of Baal Vivah Adhiniyam.

As per the prosecution story, father of prosecutrix lodged a missing person report at police station Ghattiya by stating that his minor daughter/prosecutrix is missing from home. The family members tried to search her everywhere but she could not find. During investigation prosecutrix was recovered from the possession of applicant and she told that applicant abducted her and committed rape upon her several times. It is also alleged that applicant got married with prosecutrix without consent of her parents.

Accordingly a case has been registered against the applicant.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this matter. Applicant is in jail since 9.1.2023.

Investigation is over and sta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top