SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 10446

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Awashtha – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sooraj Bhan Lodhi,Advocate General

ORDER

This is the first application filed by the applicants under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail relating to FIR No. 42 of 2024 registered at Police Station Mayapur, District Shivpuri (M.P.) for the offence under Sections 307, 353, 332, 186, 294, 427, 147, 148, 149 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicants argued that applicants are innocent persons and have been falsely implicated. It is further submitted that applicants are entitled to get benefit of anticipatory bail because cognizance cannot be taken without filing of the private complaint by the concerned officer for offence under section 186 of IPC. The applicants are permanent resident of District Shivpuri. Conclusion of trial is likely to take time and there is no likelihood of their absconsion, if released on bail. On these grounds, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicants.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the bail application on the ground that FIR against present applicants have been registered under sections 307, 353, 332, 294, 427, 147, 148, 149 of IPC also and the applicants are absconding since the date of registration of FIR and custodial i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top