SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 18499

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT, J
Sanjay Suryawanshi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
CRA 4397/2024



Advocates:
Abhijeet Awasthi,Advocate General

The court granted bail under strict conditions, emphasizing the need to balance the rights of the accused with the integrity of the judicial process.

Headnote:(A) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 14-A - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 437(3) - Bail application - Appellant arrested for multiple offences including those under IPC and SC/ST Act - Delay in FIR and completion of investigation considered - Conditions imposed for bail include non-contact with complainant and witnesses, regular police presence, and adherence to bond conditions. (Paras 1-12)

(B) Bail - Grant of bail is discretionary and depends on the nature of the offence, the severity of punishment, and the possibility of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. (Paras 4, 10)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was arrested on 24.02.2024, accused of serious offences including theft-related charges. The FIR was lodged 40 days post-incident, and the appellant claims false implication due to prior employment disputes.

Findings of Court:
The appeal for bail was allowed with specific conditions to ensure the integrity of the trial process.

Issues: The court addressed the delay in FIR, the appellant's claims of innocence, and the potential for witness tampering.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for balancing the rights of the accused with the integrity of the judicial process, allowing bail under strict conditions to mitigate risks.

Result: Appeal allowed with conditions.

ORDER

This is the first criminal appeal filed on behalf of the appellant under Section 14-A of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for grant of bail against order dated 02.04.2024 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST (POA) Act), Seoni (MP) passed in SC ATR No. 26/2024, by which application for grant of bail was dismissed.

2 . Appellant has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 01/2024, registered at Police Station AJAK, District Seoni (M.P.) fo r the offences punishable under Sections 294, 323, 342, 386, 120-B, 347, 348, 365, 354-A, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v) and 3(1) (w)(ii) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

3 . It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for appellant that appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. There is a delay of about 40 days in lodging of FIR. It is submitted that complainant was his employee and has committed theft in his shop. He was questioned by the appellant regarding theft, therefore, false report has been lodged against the appellant. Appellant is in jail since 24.02.2024. Investigation is complete and charge-sheet has been filed. Offence is punishable upto 7 years of imprisonment. Considering aforesaid circumstances, prayer is made to release appellant on bail.

4. Learned Government Advocate appearing for State as well as counsel appearing for the objector opposed the appeal for grant of bail. It is submitted that appellant is politically influential person and he will not allow fair trial.

Witnesses may be threatened. Appellant is also having criminal antecedents and as many as 3 cases are registered against the appellant in year 2014, 2015 and 2019. In these circumstances, appellant may not be released on bail.

5. Counsel appearing for the objector has presented a pendrive before this Court to be seen in Court.

6. Counsel appearing for the appellant objected to said pendrive and submitted that comliances of Section 65-B of Evidence Act is not made. It cannot be said that said pendrive is genuine or not. It is to be seen at the stage of trial whether pendrive is genuine.

7. Considering the objection, pendrive is not played in Court and prosecution is at liberty to use the pendrive in course of trial, if conditions under Section 65 of Evidence Act is satisfied.

8. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 9. Offence alleged is punishable upto 7 years of imprisonment. Appellant is in jail since 24.02.2024. Investigation is complete and charge-sheet has been filed. One of the co-accused in the case namely Vijay has been released on bail. It is submitted that during course of trial, one of the co-accused namely Vicky @ Saurabh died in jail.

10. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, criminal appeal filed by appellant is allowed on following conditions :

    (i) Appellant will not try to contact the complainant or witnesses of the case.
    (ii) Appellant will mark his presence before local police station on 15th of every month till completion of trial ;
    (iii) If appellant is found to be involved in any other offence in future or threatens witnesses of the case, then the bail granted to appellant shall automatically and appellant shall be arrested in this crime number.
    (iv) Appellant will not seek unnecessary adjournments and will regularly appear on all dates except the exceptional circumstances.

11. It is directed that on appellant's furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with two solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court concerned, he be released on bail.

12. The appellant shall abide by the following conditions of Section 437 (3) of Cr. P. C. as under:- (a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this Chapter;

    (b) that such person shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected of the commission of which he is suspected

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top