SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Prem Narayan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Prashant Sharma,Advocate General

ORDER

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 11.02.2021 passed by Commissioner, Gwalior Division in Appeal No.170/2020-21 whereby the order dated 25.03.2011 passed by SDO by which the application under Section 89 of Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 was allowed and the order dated 07.07.2016 passed by Collector by which appeal preferred against the order dated 25.03.2011 had been dismissed, had been set-aside holding that under Section 89 of Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, the SDO has no power to correct the land records as the same has been conferred to the Tehsildar.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents No.3 to 7 submits that Signature Not Verified Signed by: YOGENDRA Hukma, Babariya and Barelal are brothers and son of one Bansi Jatav. They executed a registered power of attorney in favour of petitioner upon which survey No.1467/2 had been sold through registered sale-deed to approx 80 persons. There is no dispute with regard to the said power of attorney, however the dispute is with regard to forged sale-deed in respect of which a civil suit had been filed by the respondents which was dismissed and appea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top