2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 19061
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT ON THE 10th OF JANUARY, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 44847 of 2023 BETWEEN:- JAYANT JAGET S/O SHRI LAL SHAH JAGET, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PATWRI (UNDER SUSPENSION) TEHSIL HARAD R/O VILLAGE SATDEV TEH- NUSRULLAGANJ PRESENT R/O M.N. 104 SAI ARYA COLONY HARDA DISTRICT HARDA (MADHYA PRADESH) .....APPLICANT (BY SHRI K. C. GHILDIYAL, SR. ADVOCATE WITH SHRI H. C. SINGH, ADVOCATE ) AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICE STATION CIVIL LINE DISTRICT HARDA (MADHYA PRADESH) .....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI NARENDRA CHOURASIA, GOVT. ADVOCATE) This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Warija Ghildiyal,Advocate General
ORDER
This is the first bail application filed on behalf of the applicant/accused under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail, as he is under apprehension of his arrest, in connection with Crime No.274/2023, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Harda, District Harda (M.P.) for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 384/34 of Indian Penal Code.
2 . Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that applicant was Patwari and posted in Halka No.8, Samradha. As per order of SDO he was given charge on 12.3.2019. Certified copy of Sansodhan Panji (mutation register) was produced before the applicant for mutating the name of persons named in Sansodhan Panji and, therefore, applicant carried out mutation. Mutation done by applicant was certified by Tehsildar. Later on it came to light that Sansodhan Panji on basis of which certified copy was prepared, was forged. Sansodhan Panji was maintained in office of Kanoongo. Applicant had no access to said office. There was manipulation in records in said office which cannot be attributed to applicant. Applicant complied with the orders. Applicant made entries as per certified copy of Sansodhan Panji. It is submitted that applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. It is further submitted that applicant is a Government servant and there is no likelihood of his absconding from law and will co-operate in investigation and trial. In these circumstances, applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 3. Learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State opposed the application for grant of anticipatory bail. It is submitted by him that forgery has been committed by the applicant and huge amount of money has been received by the applicant being Patwari of village to complete the task of making forged entries for transfer of tribal land to non-tribals. Applicant is required for investigation. In these circumstances anticipatory bail application be dismissed. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
5. One Abhishek Mishra, Patwari of Village Sonkhedi has filed a complaint regarding transfer of tribal land in favour of non-tribals of Village Jamli Damami. Record was corrected. Entries were made in record by making forged signature of Tehsildar. Revenue cases were of year 2009 and 2010 and mutation entries were verified in year 2013-14 and current records were corrected in year 2022-23 which were suspicious. Mutation entries were said to have been made on basis of order passed by Tehsildar, Harda. Records were corrected by respective Patwaris by using their Id. On basis of said application, Collector Harda has constituted a team for identifying the cases where illegalities have been committed.
6. Enquiry team constituted of SDO, Tehsildar and Upper Collector, District Harda. Statement of Rajesh S/o Narprasad Bishnoi, resident of village Jamli Damami, Lokesh S/o Narmada Prasad Bishnoi, resident of Jamli Damami, Sharad S/o Premnarayan Bishnoi resident of Jamliubari, Vidya Bai W/o Shantilal Bishnoi, resident of Revapur, Lucky Bishnoi S/o Brijmohan Bishnoi, resident of Samradha was recorded. Replies of current Tehsildar namely, S. U. Sayyed, J. L. Maran, Ajay Sharma and Archana Gupta were considered and their signatures were obtained. Show cause notice was also issued to then Patwaris and records were examined in detail by the enquiry committee.
Enquiry report was submitted on 6.7.2023 and it was found that entries were made in revenue records giving reference to Sanshodan Panji (mutation register). Entries were made by Patwari using their Id. and land of tribals were transferred in name of non-tribals. Entries which were made in Sanshodan Panji was found to be forged. Cases in which Tehsildar has passed orders were forged and original records were also not found. Certified copies were prepared on basis of forged mutation entries in the register and on basis of said certified copies Patwaris, using their Id.