SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 18524

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT, J
Santosh Baiga – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 14063/2024



Advocates:
Pushp Raj Singh Gaharwar,Advocate General

The court granted bail based on the significant delay in FIR lodging and the absence of risk of witness tampering, emphasizing the need for personal bond and compliance with specific conditions.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Bail application - Applicant in custody since 30.10.2023 for offences under IPC and POCSO Act - Delay of seven months in lodging FIR - Prosecutrix aged 17 years - No chance of influencing witnesses - Bail granted with conditions. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Conditions for bail - Applicant required to furnish personal bond and comply with conditions under Section 437(3) of Cr. P.C. (Para 7)

Facts of the case:
The applicant sought bail after being in custody for alleged offences against a minor, with a significant delay in FIR lodging and no current risk of tampering with evidence.

Findings of Court:
Bail application allowed, with the applicant to be released on a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and one solvent surety.

Issues: The main issues included the delay in FIR lodging and the potential for witness tampering.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the lack of risk of influencing witnesses due to the delay in lodging the FIR and the prosecutrix's testimony already being recorded.

Result: Bail granted.

ORDER

This is first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail who is in custody since 30.10.2023 relating to FIR No.366/2023 registered at Police Station Gadhwa District Singrauli (M.P.) for the offences under Sections 376, 376(D), 450, 506- II of the IPC and Sections 5(L), (5(j)(ii), 6, 5(4), 4(1), 3(a), 17 of the POCSO Act.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that prosecutrix is aged about 17 years 4 months and 9 days. There is delay in lodging of FIR about seven months. Applicant is in custody since 30.10.2023. In these circumstances, he may be granted bail.

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State as well as counsel for objector opposed the application for grant of bail. It is submitted that prosecutrix is minor. She has deposed against the applicant. 4. Heard the counsel for the parties. 5. There is a long delay in lodging of FIR. Prosecutrix has also examined in the Court and now there is no chance that applicant will be able to influence the witness or tamper with evidence. Considering totality the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, bail application filed by applicant is allowed.

6. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned for his regular appearance before Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this regard during pendency of trial.

7. The applicant shall also abide by the following conditions of Section 437 (3) of Cr. P. C. as under:- (a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this Chapter;

  • (b) that such person shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected of the commission of which he is suspected and;
  • (c) that such person shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
  •  

 

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top