SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 17666

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Archana Jain – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Nitesh Kumar Jain,Advocate General

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs :-

    (i) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and quash the order, dated 31.1.2024 (Annexure-P/4) and order dated 13.2.2024 (Annexure-P/6) passed by the respondent no. 4. (ii) A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to allow petitioner ware house to store the food grains in year for Rabi Marketing Season 2024-2025.
    (iii) Any other order or orders that this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be passed.

2. Against the order of black listing, the petitioner had already preferred an appeal which is pending before Managing Director, M.P. Warehousing and Logistic Corporation, Bhopal. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that although the appeal was filed on 13.2.2024 but no decision has been taken so far.

3. Per contra, it is submitted by counsel for the State that Senior officials are required to discharge more responsibility during on-going election process and on certain occasions, even they are sent as observer to different States, therefore, appeal cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top