SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 15024

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Prakash Chand Jain – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashish Rawat,Advocate General

ORDER

By the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,the petitioners are challenging the order dated 29.12.2023 (Annexure-P/5 and P/6) passed by respondent No.3.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide order dated19.12.2023 and 21.12.2023, the petitioners have been granted a temporary permit allowing them to ply their vehicle bearing registration No.GJ-04-Z-0568 and MP-45-P-0702 for the route from Rajgarh to Ranapur and Bhabra toRanapur which is valid upto 29.02.2024 but without giving any notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, the timing of temporary permit grantedto the petitioners has been cancelled vide order dated 29.12.2023 (Annexure-P/5 and P/6). He submits that the authority has no right to review its own order or change the timing once it is approved. In support of his contention, he placesreliance upon an order dated 20.02.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.No.14117/2019 [M/s Trivedi Bus Service Through Yogendra Trivedi Vs. Transport Department and others] wherein the Court had observed that the Regional Transport Authority has no power to review its own order whereas the power of review is a statutory power grante

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top