HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI
Vikas Adiwasi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 10614/2024
ANTICIPATORY BAIL - EXCISE ACT - SECTION 34(2) - NO SEIZURE FROM APPLICANT - NO CRIMINAL ANTECEDENTS - AGE OF APPLICANT - BAIL GRANTED
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was accused of possessing 56 bulk liters of illicit country-made liquor based on the memorandum statement of a co-accused from whom the liquor was seized.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was no seizure from the applicant, no criminal antecedents, and the applicant was 19 years old.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act despite the lack of seizure from him.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that considering the applicant's age, lack of criminal antecedents, and the totality of the circumstances, it was appropriate to grant anticipatory bail.
Final Decision: The court allowed the application and directed the release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety.
ORDER
This is the first application filed by the applicants under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR/Crime No.69/2024 dated 22.02.2024 registered at Police Station Naryawali District Sagar for the offences punishable under Section 34 (2) of Excise Act.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that as per the allegations levelled by the prosecution, there is seizure of 56 bulk liters of illicit country made liquor from the co-accused and only on the basis of memorandum statement of co-accused, the present applicant has been made an accused in the present case. Nothing has been seized from the possession of the present applicant. There is no previous criminal record of the applicant under Section 34 (1) of M.P. Excise Act. Applicant is aged about 19 years. No custodial interrogation is required in this matter. If the anticipatory bail is not granted to the applicant, his reputation in the society will be tarnished. There is no probability of his absconding or tampering with the evidence of prosecution.
Therefore, prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant.
3. The counsel for the State has opposed the application and submitted that there is a seizure of 56 bulk liters of illicit country made liquor from the co- accused, therefore, taking into consideration the conduct of the applicant, the applicant is not entitled to be enlarged on bail.
4. A perusal of the case diary it reflects that there is seizure of 56 bulk liters of illicit country made liquor from co-accused and on the basis of memorandum statement of co-accused, the present applicant has been made as an accused in the present case. The applicant is aged about 19 and there is no criminal antecedents of the present applicant.
5. Considering the totality of the circumstances of the case, the age of the present applicant and also the fact that the past criminal antecedents of the applicant is unblemished, this Court deems it appropriate to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail, therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, the application is allowed.
6. It is directed that in the event of arrest, applicant Vikas Adiwasi shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer for his appearance before him during the course of investigation or before the trial Court concerned during trial, as the case may be.
7. It is further directed that the applicant shall abide by all the conditions as enumerated under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (MANINDER S. BHATTI) JUDGE sp (MANINDER S. BHATTI) JUDGE sp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.