HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajendra Kumar Jaroliya – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
(Pronounced on 22/04/2021)
Per: Mohammad Rafiq, C.J.
All these matters have been laid before the Full Bench upon a reference
from a learned Single Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.4.2019,
assuming conflict between the ratio of two judgments rendered by Division
Benches of this Court, one in Writ Petition No.6913/2917-Brij Kumar
Chanpuriya Vs. State of M.P. & others decided on 15.5.2017 and another in
Writ Appeal No.551/2019-Anter Singh & others Vs. State of M.P. & others
decided on 17.5.2019, for answering the following three questions of law:-
“1.
Whether the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court
in WP No.6913/2017 on 15.05.2017 lays down the correct law
in regard to Section 48-AA and Section 50-A of the Act of
1960 or the order passed in Writ Appeal No.551/2019 affirming
the order passed by the Single Bench of this Court in WP
No.5033/2019?
2.
Whether the provisions of Section 48-AA and Section 50-A of
the Act of 1960 operates in a different sphere i.e. pre and post
election of the Director?
3.
Whether Section 50-A of the Act of 1960 is a deeming
provision for holding a Director of a society as disqualified or
an opportunity of hearing is still required to be gi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.